Alien Metals Limited (UFO.L) Maiden iron ore resource in excess of 10Mt

Alien Metals announces maiden Inferred iron ore Resource in excess of 10Mt at 60.4% Fe

Follow the link to view the announcement in full including all figures:

http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/5175M_1-2021-9-21.pdf

Alien Metals Ltd (LSE AIM:UFO), a global minerals exploration and development company, is pleased to update the market on the Hancock Iron Ore Project in the Pilbara region of Western Australia and specifically the publication of a maiden Inferred Resource in excess of 10Mt.

Highlights

· The initial Inferred JORC compliant resource stands at 10.4Mt @ 60.4% Fe including 7.8Mt @ 60.1% at the Sirius Extension target, 1.5Mt @ 61.2% at the Ridge E target and 1.1Mt @ 61.9% Fe at the Ridge C target.

· The Mineral Resource Statement (“MRE”) has been restricted to material that falls within an optimised open pit shell and within the tenement boundary.

· Low levels of deleterious elements indicating that Hancock could produce high-quality Direct Shipping Ore (DSO) product.

· Ridges E and C are only partially tested to date, and the Company feel they have considerable potential to define further DSO grade material.

Bill Brodie Good, CEO & Technical Director of Alien Metals, commented:

“We are really pleased to have delineated in excess of 10Mt of DSO iron ore with our initial MRE at Hancock. With only a quarter of the Western Ridges targets tested to date, we believe there is considerable scope to grow the DSO resource over the next 6 months.

“Having a sizeable maiden resource is encouraging; having DSO material with low impurities is even more pleasing and we are pushing ahead on the scoping study work with Mining Plus and continued planning for the Phase 3 drilling programme.”

Figure 1 shows the location of the Hancock Project and Table 1 shows the mineral resource statement. The Hancock Project, tenement number E47/3954, is approximately 10 km north of Newman in the prolific iron ore producing Pilbara region of Western Australia.

A description of the Mineral Resource Estimate is given in the following section with the work summarised in JORC Table 1 located in Appendix 1.

Figure 1: Location of Hancock Iron Ore Project, Western Australia

Table 1: Mineral Resource Statement, Hancock Iron Ore Project, Alien Metals, September 2021

Mineral Resource Estimation Summary

The Mineral Resource Estimate was completed by Baker Geological Services Ltd (“BGS”), being an independent consultancy to Alien. The Mineral Resource Statement has been classified by Competent Person, Howard Baker (FAusIMM(CP)) in accordance with guidelines contained in the JORC Code. Due to the Covid-19 Pandemic, Mr Baker of BGS has not been able to visit the project and observe the exploration activities. As such, BGS has relied upon the experience of the team employed by Alien and the QA/QC practices adopted. The Mineral Resource Statement has an effective date of 16 September 2021. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves have no demonstrated economic viability. BGS and Alien are not aware of any factors (environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or other relevant factors) that have materially affected the Mineral Resource Estimate.

The Mineral Resource Estimate covers three targets within the tenement boundary. These are the Sirius Extension Target, Ridge C and Ridge E, that form part of the Western Ridges prospect. All targets are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, along with the drill collars / traces and the final optimised pit shell used for reporting the final Mineral Resource Statement. The topographic surface shown in Figure 2 highlights the prominent ridges within the tenement.

Figure 2: Tenement boundary and target location. Drill collars shown in green, and the optimised pits shown in red

Figure 3: Tenement boundary and target location. Drill traces coloured by Fe% and the optimised pits shown in red

Geology and Geological Interpretation

The tenement area consists of a series of low east/west running rocky ridge lines separated by shallow valleys. The area has been structurally deformed with the presence of numerous fold hinges, some isoclinal, but all trending east/west with a shallow (<34°) plunge.

Most of the ridge lines consist of Banded Iron which is part of the Weeli Wolli Formation. The Weeli Wolli Formation is described as a thick succession of jaspilite, shale, and dolerite overlying the Brockman Iron Formation. The iron formations stand out as ridges on which there is some exposure, but the intervening shale and dolerite are rarely exposed.

The logging and assay data has been used to define the mineralised Banded Iron Formation (“BIF”) units along with a weathered cap located at surface where possible. At the Sirius Extension target, a steeply dipping BIF unit has been modelled along with a weathered cap domain. The BIF domain has been further subdivided into low / high silica domains following a review of geochemical data. Figure 4 shows the BIF/ Cap domains with Figure 5 showing the division of the BIF domain into high and low silica domains.

Figure 4: Sirius Extension BIF (Brown) and Weathered Cap (Blue)

Figure 5: Sirius Extension High Silica domain (purple) and Low Silica domain (red)

At the Western Ridges Prospect, Ridge C has been modelled to contain a single BIF domain and a weathered cap domain, while Ridge E has been modelled to contain two separate BIF domains. No weathered cap has been modelled at Ridge E. At both Ridge C and Ridge E, limited data restricts the interpretation with the overall dip of the mineralised units being reliant on mapping data with a dip of between 15° and 20° being used to guide the modelling process.

Figure 6: Ridge C and Ridge E BIF and Cap domains

Exploration Summary

Alien undertook two Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling programs at the project between January and June 2021. Table 2 summarises the drilling meters completed at each target along with the number of Fe assays collected. The data presented for the Sirius Extension target includes four historic drillholes completed by Volta Mining Pty Ltd in 2014. The drillhole locations are shown in Figure 2 to Figure 6.

The RC drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples via a 4-way splitter from which 3 kg was pulverized to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay. Logging was completed on all RC chips. Drilling challenges including sample recovery and the presence of water. In addition, logging was not consistent across drill programmes with clay and mineralised BIF material being interchanged. As such, the modelling has placed a reliance on the geochemical data.

All samples generated by Alien were dispatched to Intertek Genalysis at Maddington, Perth, WA, and analysed for their Standard Iron Ore Package Analysis with XRF finish, which includes elements Fe, Al, Ca, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, S and Si. This is the same as the analysis and laboratory used in all Alien’s analysis work on these projects to date, to maintain consistency and comparability between all analyses.

In addition, Alien used the industry standard of inserting 5% Certified Reference Material (“CRM”) samples and 5% duplicate samples at source. The CRMs are sourced from Geostats Pty Ltd, Perth, WA, a global leader in the manufacture and sale of CRMs.

All QA/QC results are deemed acceptable with adequate variation from the standard acceptable CRM grades received. Duplicate samples also returned acceptable results to ensure that all laboratory analysis results are within international standards and are fit for use in the Mineral Resource Estimate.

Alien did not collect density data as part of this programme with density being applied through a review of analogous project.

Downhole surveys were completed at 30 m downhole intervals and all drillhole collars were surveyed through differential GPS.

Figure 7 shows the RC drilling in progress.

Figure 7: RC drilling in progress, Hancock Iron Ore Project, June 2021

Overall, the data collected has been deemed suitable for use in a Mineral Resource Estimate for the project.

Mineral Resource Estimation

The Mineral Resource Estimate was completed in Leapfrog Software with additional statistical studies completed in Supervisor. Samples were composited into 2 m lengths prior to geostatistical studies and grade estimation.

The composite files for each target were used in a geostatistical study that enabled Ordinary Kriging (“OK”) to be used as the main interpolation method for the Sirius Extension target. Robust variograms could not be produced at Ridge C and Ridge E due to the limited data and as such, an Inverse Distance Weighting interpolation was carried out for these targets.

The interpolation used an elliptical search following the predominant dip and dip direction of the geological zones with a variable orientation used within the surficial Cap domains where the topographic surface is a contributing factor to the domain and grade distribution.

For each domain where variography was possible, variography was completed on all assay fields being estimated into the block model, these being Fe, SiO2, Al2O3, P, MnO and LOI. Figure 8 shows the Sirius Extension block model with the model and drillhole file coloured by Fe grade.

A density of 3.0 t/m3 was applied to all mineralised BIF material with a density of 2.5 t/m3 applied to the weathered Cap. A density of 2.8 t/m3 was applied to all external host material.

Figure 8: Sirius Extension Block model and drillhole file coloured by Fe %

The interpolated block model was validated through visual checks and a comparison of the mean input composite and output model grades. As an example, Figure 9 and Figure 10 show SWATH plots for the Sirius Extension high and low silica domains. As shown, a strong correlation exists between the input composite and output block model grades in the easting direction shown.

BGS is confident that the interpolated block grades are a reasonable reflection of the available sample data available.

Figure 9: Sirius Extension Fe SWATH plot, high SiO2 domain

Figure 10: Sirius Extension Fe SWATH plot, low SiO2 domain

Mineral Resource Classification

All deposits have been classified as Inferred Mineral Resources. Primarily, this is due to the lack of density data, the limited data at Ridge C and Ridge E, and the lack of verification diamond drilling to confirm the grade identified through the RC drilling and the drilling challenges observed. That said, continuous packages of mineralised BIF have been identified and BGS is confident that future drilling will increase the classification confidence category assigned.

At the Sirius Extension Target, the base of the Inferred Mineral Resources was restricted to the deepest drillhole intersections within the mineralised body, shown in Figure 11. All mineralised BIF material modelled at Ridge C and Ridge E was classified as an Inferred Mineral Resource with no depth restriction, due to the limited down dip extent of the models, shown in Figure 12 and Figure 13.

Figure 11: Sirius Extension classified model and drillhole traces

Figure 12: Ridge C classified model and drillhole traces

Figure 13: Ridge E classified model and drillhole traces

Open Pit Optimisation

To determine the final Mineral Resource Statement, the model has been subjected to an optimisation exercise to determine the proportion of the material defined that has a reasonable prospect of economic extraction via open-pit mining methods. The optimisation was carried out by independent consultants Mining Plus. In addition, Mining Plus undertook an audit of the Mineral Resource Estimate carried out by BGS with no material issues identified.

The optimisation was based on the mineralised BIF material only. The Cap was excluded from the optimisation and is not currently being reported as a mineralised domain. The optimisation used a baseline metal price of USD210/t, a price that has been exceeded over the course of the previous 12 months. BGS comment that Mining Plus also provided optimised pit shells at a baseline price of USD100/t and USD150/t with very little sensitivity shown in the final Mineral Resource Statement.

The interpretation of the word ‘eventual’ in this context relates to a bulk commodity where it is reasonable to envisage ‘eventual economic extraction’ as covering time periods more than 50 years.

No cut-off grade has been applied to the final Mineral Resource Statement due to the general lack of grade sensitivity and the optimisation process undertaken.

At the Sirius Extension Target, approximately 200k tonnes of material has been excluded from the final Mineral Resource Statement as it lies outside of the tenement boundary. The optimisation process did however allow the pit crest to extend beyond the tenement boundary.

This represents the material considered by BGS to have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction potential.

Figure 14 to Figure 16 shows the final Mineral Resource within the USD210/t optimised pit shells.

Figure 14: Sirius Extension Mineral Resource within the optimised pit

Figure 15: Ridge C Mineral Resource within the optimised pit

Figure 16: Ridge E Mineral Resource within the optimised pit

Background to Inferred Resource

The statements have been classified by Competent Person, Howard Baker (FAusIMM(CP)) in accordance with the JORC Code. The Mineral Resource Statement has an effective date of 16 September 2021. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves have no demonstrated economic viability. BGS and Alien are not aware of any factors (environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or other relevant factors) that have materially affected the Mineral Resource Estimate.

The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Mineral Resources as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource; and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category.

BGS notes that the Mineral Resource has a reasonable prospect for eventual economic extraction but are not considered Mineral Reserves. Mineral Reserves are estimates of the tonnage and grade or quality of material contained in a Mineral Resource that can be economically mined and processed. To be considered a Mineral Reserve, modifying factors must be applied to the Mineral Resource estimate as part of the preparation of a prefeasibility study (PFS) or a feasibility study (FS). The estimated amount of saleable material contained in the final product must demonstrate a positive Net Present Value (NPV) using an appropriate discount rate and must demonstrate that eventual extraction could be reasonably justified. The major categories of modifying factors include:

· Mining,

· Processing,

· Metallurgical,

· Environmental,

· Location and infrastructure,

· Market factors,

· Legal (including land tenure and third-party ownership),

· Economic,

· Social, and

· Governmental

Mineral Resource Statement

Table 3 shows the resulting Mineral Resource Statement for the Hancock Project. All material is reported within the optimised pit shells and within the tenement boundary.

Table 3: Mineral Resource Statement at a 0% Fe cut-off grade, Hancock Iron Ore Project, Alien Metals, September 2021

Upside Potential and next phase

With the improved understanding of the enrichment horizon and the large extent of untested highly prospective ridges still to be tested and hopefully added into an updated and enlarged future resource, Alien plans to target the specific horizons in the next drilling programme, with the hope to increase both volume and confidence in these initial mineral resources. Figure 17 shows the location of the current drilling and the future ridge lines to be drill tested.

Figure 17: Target areas for further ground reconnaissance, Hancock Tenement, Hamersley Iron Ore Project, August 2021

Read More

For further information please visit the Company’s website at www.alienmetals.uk, or contact:

Alien Metals Limited

Bill Brodie Good, CEO & Technical Director

(via St-James’ Corporate Services, Company Secretary)

Tel: +44 20 7796 8644


Linking Shareholders and Executives :Share Talk

If anyone reads this article found it useful, helpful? Then please subscribe www.share-talk.com or follow SHARE TALK on our Twitter page for future updates. Terms of Website Use All information is provided on an as-is basis. Where we allow Bloggers to publish articles on our platform please note these are not our opinions or views and we have no affiliation with the companies mentioned
Share Talk
Tweet
WhatsApp
Email
Pocket
Share
Share
Malcare WordPress Security